141. Linked List Cycle 🔁
Difficulty: Easy - Tags: Linked List, Two Pointers
Problem Statement 📜
Given the head of a linked list, determine if the linked list has a cycle in it.
There is a cycle in a linked list if there is some node in the list that can be revisited by continuously following the next pointer. Internally, pos is used to denote the index of the node that the tail's next pointer connects to, but pos is not passed as a parameter.
Return true if there is a cycle in the linked list. Otherwise, return false.
Examples 🌟
🔹 Example 1:

Input:
head = [3,2,0,-4], pos = 1Output:
trueExplanation: There is a cycle in the linked list, where the tail connects to the 1st node (0-indexed).
🔹 Example 2:

Input:
head = [1,2], pos = 0Output:
trueExplanation: There is a cycle in the linked list, where the tail connects to the 0th node.
🔹 Example 3:

Input:
head = [1], pos = -1Output:
falseExplanation: There is no cycle in the linked list.
Constraints ⚙️
The number of the nodes in the list is in the range
[0, 10^4].-10^5 <= Node.val <= 10^5.posis-1or a valid index in the linked list.
Follow-Up 🔎
Can you solve it using O(1) (i.e., constant) memory?
Solution 💡
The problem can be solved using the two-pointer technique (Floyd’s Cycle Detection Algorithm):
Use two pointers:
A
slowpointer moves one step at a time.A
fastpointer moves two steps at a time.
If there is a cycle, the
slowandfastpointers will meet at some point inside the cycle.If the
fastpointer reaches the end (null), then there is no cycle.
Java Solution
class Solution {
public boolean hasCycle(ListNode head) {
if (head == null || head.next == null) {
return false;
}
ListNode slow = head;
ListNode fast = head;
while (fast != null && fast.next != null) {
slow = slow.next;
fast = fast.next.next;
// If slow meets fast, there is a cycle
if (slow == fast) {
return true;
}
}
return false; // No cycle detected
}
}Explanation of the Solution
Two Pointers:
The
slowpointer moves step by step.The
fastpointer skips one step to move faster.
Cycle Detection:
If a cycle exists, the
fastpointer will eventually catch up to theslowpointer.
Edge Cases:
If the list is empty (
head == null) or contains only one node (head.next == null), there can be no cycle.
Time Complexity ⏳
O(n): Both pointers traverse the list. In the worst case, they traverse each node once.
Space Complexity 💾
O(1): The solution uses constant memory, satisfying the follow-up constraint.
You can find the full solution here.
Last updated
Was this helpful?